"I honestly don't know. At this point it's in suspended animation," he said when asked about the film's status. "The studio, the director Ivan Reitman and Harold Ramis feel there must be a way to do it, but Bill Murray will not do the movie. He doesn't want to be involved. He's got six kids, houses all over America. He golfs in these tournaments where they pay him to turn up and have a laugh. He's into this life and living it. I know we'd have a lot of fun [but] I can't be mad at him. He’s a friend first, a colleague second. We have a deep personal relationship that transcends business and he doesn’t want to know."
Aykroyd previously said that one possibility would be to recast Murray's role, but he adds that they are "not going to do a movie that exploits the franchise. The script has to be perfect. I'm the cheerleader, but I'm only one voice in the matter. It's a surety that Bill Murray will not do the movie, however there is still interest from the studio (ComingSoon.Net)."
No Bill Murray, no Ghostbusters 3, that's my opinion. Could they still do it? Yea, I guess there is always a way. They could open the movie at Peter Venkman's funeral or something like that, but it's probably not worth it.
I get Bill Murray's stance. Maybe he is done with it, maybe he is fearful of a "Crystal Skull" incident, maybe the writing sucks. Whatever the case, he probably has a point. SAYING THAT, this is the same guy who did Garfield, and Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties, so he isn't beyond just cashing a check (not to mention Charlie's Angels).
I get it, I really do, and maybe he is doing us all a favor, but I can't help but be a little dissapointed.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar